Legal Opinion

Hastings Land Improvement Co. v. . the Empire State Sur.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 22, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. Plaintiff sued upon a bond of the defendant, given to insure the performance of a construction contract.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 22, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. Plaintiff sued upon a bond of the defendant, given to insure the performance of a construction contract. The complaint alleges the abandonment of the work by the contractor, the refusal of the surety, after notice, to undertake the work and completion of the contract by plaintiff at a cost of $3,000 and upwards over the contract price. The defense was that the plaintiff and contractor had made…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscooic, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Oardozo and Seabury, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. British American Tobacco Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Veneto v. McCloskey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API