In Re the Estate of Parker

(dissenting) — Upon the principal appeal, I cannot view the facts, and, consequently the applicable law, as do the majority.

The facts here seem to me to overthrow the presumption as to the property being community. There is no evidence that the community furnished any part of the consideration paid for the two properties, or that they were purchased on the credit of the community, even though notes and mortgages were given, as mere expedients, as in Guye v. Guye, 63 Wash. 340, 115 Pac. 731, 37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 186; Chapman v. Edwards, 113 Wash. 224, 193 Pac. 712; Dart v. McDonald, 114 Wash.…