Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barner v. Marsh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1929No. 21356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is a suit in this court invoking the original jurisdiction of the court, in which the plaintiff seeks in the same suit a writ of mandamus and a writ of procedendo, and in which she joins as defendants the clerk of the court of Lorain county, the judges of the Court of Appeals of the Second Appellate District, the judges of the Court of Appeals of the Ninth Appellate District, one of the judges of the court of common pleas of Lorain county, one of the judges of the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county, one of the judges of the Court of Appeals of the Third Appellate…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Rice v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State ex rel. Ellis v. HurdOhio Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API