The Priscilla
District Court, S.D. New York
lu Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
BliOWN, District Judge.
The evidence shows clearly a long-established practice and usage of the company to receive passengers’ baggage at tlio Fall River pier, for transportation by the afternoon steamer, in anticipation of tickets to be obtained and afterwards presented. The libelant's dress case and bis wife’s trunk were received from the libelant’s expressman bv the proper agent of the company at the pier between 8 and -1 o'clock of the afternoon on. which the Priscilla was to sail for Boston, and a receipt was given for the same in accordance with the usual custom. The articles were,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Belger v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Zimmer v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The New EnglandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901
- Gomm v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- The PriscillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- Zetler v. Tonopah & Goldfield RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1912