Legal Opinion

Morton v. Harvey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1899No. 8302PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

The firm of James Richards & Co. entered into a contract with Washington county to erect for it a courthouse, to furnish all material and perform all the labor, and in the course of the transaction gave a bond for the .due and faithful compliance with the obligations of the contract, of which instrument the plaintiff in error was signer as surety. The defendant in error, Charles A. Harvey, as subcontractor, ■ furnished some material for use in and about the building, and did some labor thereon, for all of which the agreed price was |1,650, of which sum he had been paid a part, and for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Korsmeyer Plumbing & Heating Co. v. McClayNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Middleboro National Bank v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of Gastonia v. McEntee-Peterson Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Larkin v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. City of Alpena ex rel. Zess v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Des Moines Bridge & Iron Works v. Marxen & RokahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API