Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Comer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1950No. Appeals, Nos. 150, 151 and 152PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The appellant, his son, Willard E. Comer, Jr., and John Hiestand, were indicted for burglary, larceny, violation of the Uniform Firearms Act, and possession of burglary tools. Willard E. Comer, Jr., entered a plea of guilty. Comer, Sr., and Hiestand were found guilty by verdict of a jury.

During the night of January 19, 1950, Comer, Jr., and Hiestand left the city of Washington, where they lived together, and travelled by automobile to Bentley-ville. They there “cased” the Moose Club and waited until the steward of the club left about 2:00 A.M. on the morning of January…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Com. of Pa. v. Retacco RetaccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Comer v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Comer v. ClaudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. PetrulliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API