City of Dublin v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Deshler, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, the state of Ohio, has appealed from a decision and entry -of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas partially granting a motion by plaintiffs-appellees, the city of Dublin and the city of Upper Arlington, to compel discovery.
The underlying action in this case was brought by the plaintiff municipalities as a constitutional challenge to certain provisions of H.B. No. 283, the biennial budget bill enacted by the Ohio legislature in 1999. The provisions at issue reduce or eliminate the authority of municipalities to regulate use of public rights-of-way by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Columbus City School Dist. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Ex Parte James Richard "Rick" Perry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick"Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015