P.J.P. v. M.M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY McLAUGHLIN, J.:
P.J.P. ("Father") appeals pro se from the order denying his Petition for Modification of a Custody Order with respect to his minor son, M.P. ("Child"). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding primary physical custody to M.M. ("Mother"), and did not err in not considering the factors set forth in Wiseman v. Wall , 718 A.2d 844 (Pa.Super. 1998), because the Wiseman factors have been superseded by statute. We therefore affirm.
Father and Mother married in March 2013 and separated in August 2013; Child was born in November 2013. It is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- J.R.M. v. J.E.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- S.W.D. v. S.A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- C.R.F. v. S.E.FSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- V.B. v. J.E.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- S.T. v. R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Attar v. DMS Tollgate, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- T.M. v. H.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- J.L.H. v. J.C.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019