Legal Opinion
Bente v. Department of Water & Power
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1941No. Civ. No. 13087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in a declaratory relief action by which plaintiff sought to have it declared that he was blanketed into the civil service of respondent city as an “auto machinist”, because of the provisions of section 121 of the charter of respondent city adopted July 1, 1925 (Stats. [1925] 1069), defendants appeal.
The essential stipulated facts are:
February 20, 1920, plaintiff was employed by Board of Public Service Commissioners to perform the duties of the position of “auto machinist” in the Department of Public Service, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barry v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Leahey v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- METROPOLITAN GOV. OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON CO. v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Little v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.