Legal Opinion

American Bulb Co. v. Spiwak

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.

The plaintiffs are creditors of the defendant William Spiwak. They seek (1) money judgments on their respective claims; (2) to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of an interest in real property made by the defendant William Spiwak to Poswil Realty Corporation made December 6, 1932; and (3) an accounting from the defendant Poswil Realty Corporation of the rents to which its grantor would have been entitled.

Plaintiffs are entitled to money judgments on their respective claims, for it was conceded on the trial that the same were due and unpaid.

The only issue to be determined is whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Sabatino v. CannizzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Schaefer v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Bulb Co. v. SpiwakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. R. L. Friedland Realty, Inc. v. Mitlin Equities Corp.Yonkers City Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API