Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Pittsburgh Knife & Forge Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 29, 1929No. 3841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue from an order of the Board of Tax Appeals. As we view the ease, the question involved is, under the Revenue Act of 1917, 40 Stat. 300, can an assumed pro rata accrual of income and profit taxes for 1918 be deducted from current earnings in that year, in determining the amount of earnings available for payment of dividends, and thereby affect invested capital? That question the Tax Board answered in.the negative, holding:

“Petitioner’s invested capital for 1918 should not have been reduced on account of the tentative tax computed upon…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hadden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Washington Coal & Coke Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API