Legal Opinion

Pirkle v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1930No. 4 Div. 679PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The indictment in this case, omitting formal parts, was in the following language:

“The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this indictment that Joe Pirkle did falsely pretend to S. H. Fuller, who was at that time Vice-President of the Bank of New Brocton and acting as such, with intent to defraud, that he the said Pirkle, owned a certain mule and wagon, and by moans of such false pretense, obtained from the said Bank of New Brocton, to-wit, Seventy Hollars.
“Against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”

To sustain these allegations, there was testimony offered…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Airhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Latham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Simmons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API