Legal Opinion
Pirkle v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1930No. 4 Div. 679PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
The indictment in this case, omitting formal parts, was in the following language:
“The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this indictment that Joe Pirkle did falsely pretend to S. H. Fuller, who was at that time Vice-President of the Bank of New Brocton and acting as such, with intent to defraud, that he the said Pirkle, owned a certain mule and wagon, and by moans of such false pretense, obtained from the said Bank of New Brocton, to-wit, Seventy Hollars.
“Against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”
To sustain these allegations, there was testimony offered…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Airhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Latham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Simmons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941