Cole Fisher Rogow, Inc. v. Carl Ally, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. The advertisement, which forms the predicate for the charge of defamation, constitutes protected fair comment under the common law. (See, e.g., Foley v. Press Pub. Co., 226 App. Div. 535.) It is true, as the plaintiff con*945tends, that proof of malice would defeat that defense. However, treating the applications, made by the defendants on affidavits, as motions for summary judgment under CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]), the plaintiff has failed to state sufficient evidentiary facts, warranting a trial, to support its allegation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foley v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by27 opinions
- Immuno AG. v. Moor-JankowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Schermerhorn v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Guitar v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. WhelanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Hotchner v. Castillo-PucheDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.