Legal Opinion

Marzulli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 21, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On appeal from First District Court of Newark.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The plaintiff sues upon a policy of insurance

upon the life of Eissolo. The policy was taken out by the plaintiff and he paid the premiums. After the death of the insured he paid the funeral expenses and presented proofs of death and made claim for the insurance. Ho beneficiary is named in the policy. The plaintiff was not related by blood to the insured and the only connection by marriage was that his wife was a sister of the wife of the deceased. It is apparent, therefore, that his only claim must rest upon what is called the “facility of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LuchsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Lewis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. GodfreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. NewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. ChappellTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Molloy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CafieroNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API