Legal Opinion

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Errico

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 16, 1967No. 54Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

385 U.S. 214 (1966)

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

v.

ERRICO.

No. 54.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 20, 1966.

Decided December 12, 1966.[*]

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for petitioner in No. 54 and for respondent in No. 91. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Louis F. Claiborne, L. Paul Winings and Charles Gordon.

Frank Ierulli argued the cause for respondent in No. 54. With him on the brief was Edwin J. Peterson.

Julius C. Biervliet argued the cause for petitioner…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Warren; Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Delgadillo v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Barber v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Giuseppe Errico v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Muriel May Scott, Nee Plummer v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API