Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1961No. 9441PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Georgia Velasquez was injured when the Greyhound bus in which she was a passenger collided with the rear of defendant Interstate Motor Lines’ semi-trailer which was stopped on the side of the highway. She sued both, and the jury returned a verdict against them. Upon motion the trial court granted judgment n. o. v. in favor of Interstate Motor Lines. Greyhound appealed its case; and plaintiff cross appealed seeking to reinstate the verdict against Interstate. Greyhound voluntarily dismissed its appeal, leaving only plaintiff’s cross appeal against Interstate before us.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kimiko Toma v. Utah Power & Light CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nyman v. Cedar CityUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McMurdie v. UnderwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Harris v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jensen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Downie v. Abex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API