Bruns v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant was charged with and convicted of robbery of property having a value of less than $100. He raises four points on appeal, one of which requires discussion and reversal.
Although the evidence presented at trial would have supported a conviction of petit larceny, appellant’s request for a jury instruction on that crime was denied. In Haynes v. State, 377 So.2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), we held that larceny is necessarily included in the crime of robbery and that it is legally impossible to prove robbery without proving larceny.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.510 expressly requires…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Haynes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BrunsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982