Kaszuba v. Zientara
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentStaton, Presiding Judge
I dissent from the Majority Opinion for the following reasons:
1. The Majority has failed to frame the issue in the proper light of the facts. A question of first impression has been presented, and none of the cases cited by the Majority involve a transaction performed in another state where the transaction is authorized by statute.
2. The question involves Zientara's foreign-based right to gain possession of a lottery ticket and title to $1,696,-800.00. The Majority ignores the present and prevailing moral sense test which is commonly used.
8. I do not believe that the Indiana Constitutional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Oxfeld v. New Jersey State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.