Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaszuba v. Zientara

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1986No. 3-885A219Published

1DissentStaton, Presiding Judge

I dissent from the Majority Opinion for the following reasons:

1. The Majority has failed to frame the issue in the proper light of the facts. A question of first impression has been presented, and none of the cases cited by the Majority involve a transaction performed in another state where the transaction is authorized by statute.

2. The question involves Zientara's foreign-based right to gain possession of a lottery ticket and title to $1,696,-800.00. The Majority ignores the present and prevailing moral sense test which is commonly used.

8. I do not believe that the Indiana Constitutional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Oxfeld v. New Jersey State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API