Legal Opinion
Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
By this motion plaintiff, Eastern States Petroleum Co., Inc., seeks summary judgment dismissing a counterclaim asserted by the third-party defendant, Compania Mexicana De Petróleo “El Aguila”, S. A., against the plaintiff.
The action itself was brought December 9, 1938, under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, and the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, to enjoin the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff’s foreign commerce, and to recover treble damages.
The original defendants were Asiatic Petroleum Corporation, Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Corporation,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Banco Nacional de Cuba v. SabbatinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Marks v. SpitzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.