Legal Opinion
United States v. Reynolds
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 2, 1969No. Crim. No. 1208-67PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
This is a Motion to Dismiss the Indictment based on Rule 6(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Fifth Amendment. Defendants allege that the indictment procedure was defective in this case because the Grand Jury foreman did not read the indictment before signing it under the traditional certification “A True Bill.” This allegation was raised in open court on April 28, 1969, at what was originally scheduled to be a “Gaither hearing.” 1 But, subsequent to the scheduling of said hearing, the Court of Appeals issued its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Junius Irving Scales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Anthony Campisi, Edward Carmine Corpolla, Anthony J. Donatiello and AlfredsanantonioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. James Seeley Cyphers and James W. FerroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. James Seeley Cyphers and James W. FerroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977