DRESSER v. NORM
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAY DRESSER, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:21-cv-00168-JAW ) NORM, et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION AFTER REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Plaintiff filed a complaint in which he has failed to assert a federal claim. Accordingly, I recommend the Court dismiss the complaint. DISCUSSION Issues of subject matter jurisdiction “can be raised sua sponte at any time” because they relate to the fundamental Article III limitations on federal courts. See McBee v. Delica Co.,
417 F.3d 107, 127
(1st Cir. 2005). In this case, a review of Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.