Legal Opinion

Bartfield v. RMTS Associates, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*387Three orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered April 28, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motions of Action No. 1 plaintiff Bartfield, Action No. 2 plaintiff James Murphy and additional counterclaim defendants, and Action No. 3 defendants, pursuant to CPLR 4401, to dismiss the claims and counterclaims alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court, Justice and entry date, which declared valid James Murphy’s assignment of his member interest in Action No. 1 defendant RMTS to Action No. 2 additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. MoskovitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Gibbs v. Breed, Abbott & MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. RMTS Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Matter of Murphy v. New York State Tax Appeals Trib.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Orange County Land Improvement, Inc. v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API