Legal Opinion
Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Frates (In Re Kaiser Steel Corp.)
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 16, 1990No. Civ. A. Nos. 89-K-635, 89-K-837, Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1552 EPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in severing the counterclaims of the Perma Group, the Frates Group and the Perma Frates Joint Venture (PFJV) in Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Frates, No. 87-E-135 (Bankr.D.Colo. Feb. 26, 1987) and Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Rial, No. 87-E-437 (Bankr.D.Colo. Jan. 15, 1987). The bankruptcy court ruled that these claims should be severed and treated as claims against the underlying estate as a matter of case management, because they were not factually related to the primary claims in Frates…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Arthur OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- In Re B & L Oil Company, Debtor, Ashland Petroleum Company v. Garry R. Appel, Trustee for B & L Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Fulghum Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Waldschmidt v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. (In Re Fulghum Construction Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
- Eastridge Development Company, and Cross v. Halpert Associates, Inc. And Professional Service Industries, Inc., Defendant- and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re County of OrangeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1997
- In re CFS-Related Securities Fraud LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Nathan v. Ehrhart (In Re Ehrhart)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993