Legal Opinion

De Ganay v. De Ganay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered November 18, 1998, dismissing this action for divorce on the ground of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Prior proceedings have established that prior judgments of the French courts dissolving the parties’ marriage and liquidating the marital estate are entitled to enforcement in New York as a matter of comity (De Ganay v De Ganay, 261 AD2d 175, lv denied 93 NY2d 818). Plaintiff, in this action, now seeks equitable distribution of certain property not specifically addressed in those judgments, but the motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Ganay v. De GanayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Somma v. SommaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Bourbon v. BourbonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Caiazza v. MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Stovall v. StovallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API