Legal Opinion

Farmers Oil & Guano Co. v. Rosenthal & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1911No. 3406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. The principle of law is well settled that a contract which is valid on its face can not be held void by showing that one of the parties understood and intended it to be a wagering contract. The evidence must show that this understanding and intention was mutual, to render a contract, otherwise legitimate, invalid on that ground. Forsyth Mfg. Co. v. Castlen, 112 Ga. 205 (37 S. E. 485, 81 Am. St. R. 28) ; Stewart v. Postal Telegraph Co., 131 Ga. 31 (61 S. E. 1045, 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 692, 127 Am. St. R. 205) ; Watson v. Hazlehurst, 127 Ga. 298 (56 S. E. 459) ; Embry v. Jamison, 131 U. S. 336…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Watson v. Hazlehurst & McAllisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. Georgia Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Dawson Paper Shell Pecan Co. v. Montezuma Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API