Legal Opinion · Dissent

Advo-Systems, Inc v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1990No. Docket 120519Published

1DissentSawyer, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. At first blush, it is tempting to dismiss petitioner’s claim that Mailbox Values is a periodical within the meaning of the tax code since, with the exception of the public service announcement relating to missing children on the accompanying mailing card, Mailbox Values contains nothing but a loose-leaf collection of advertising materials. However, for the reasons to be discussed below, I conclude that nothing within the tax code itself or within the general definition of the word "periodical” warrants such a conclusion.

MCL 205.94; MSA 7.555(4) contains a list of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Niggeling v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Association of Little Friends, Inc v. City of EscanabaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API