Legal Opinion

Hotaling v. Tecumseh National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1898No. 8013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

On September 30, 1891, tbe firm of Russell & Holmes, being heavily indebted to tbe Tecumseh National Bank, conveyed to it, as security for such indebtedness, certain real estate situated in Johnson and Pawnee counties, in this state. The conveyance was by deeds of general warranty expressly declared to be subject to certain in-cumbrances therein mentioned. Afterwards Russell & Holmes, in order to obtain money with which to discharge their indebtedness to the bank and thus enable it to continue in business, induced the plaintiffs and forty-three others to execute to them a large number of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estrada v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Peden v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kuhl v. Pierce CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Van Orman v. Spafford, Clarke & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  5. Draper v. SpringportSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R. v. SyasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  2. Fisbeck v. Scherbarth, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Card v. DeansNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ames v. AmesNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Van Horn v. Lincoln Sales Outlet Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API