State v. Farnsworth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellant Justin Paul Farnsworth was arrested and charged with three counts of criminal sexual conduct. Farnsworth pleaded guilty, but prior to sentencing moved to withdraw his plea, claiming that his plea was not voluntary because he was not aware that he could challenge the admissibility of the incriminating statements that he had made during a police interview. The district court determined that a fair and just reason existed to permit a plea withdrawal because it concluded that an incriminating portion of Farnsworth’s confession was involuntary and therefore…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony James CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. ZabawaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Carey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.