Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 19, 1975No. 74-959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Judge.

It is clear from the record in this case, and undisputed by the State, that appellant’s appeal was frustrated by State action. Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239. The record is entirely adequate for the purpose of making this determination. It contains a pro se motion to the trial judge which was filed by appellant six days after judgment and sentence, asking for an appeal, requesting the appointment of an attorney and stating that he was indigent. Despite this, counsel was not appointed nor an appeal taken until after the time for appeal had expired.

We therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baggett v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Hollingshead v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. State v. FossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Hollingshead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Grine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willie James Byrd v. Joe S. Hopper, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Lingo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API