Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Edwards

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1914No. Appeal, No. 7PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 7, Oct. T., 1913, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1909, No. 3,214, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Ernest Hamilton v. William Nelson Edwards and Godfrey D. Smith, trading as the Racquet Club Garage. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $500. Defendants appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 7, Oct. T., 1913, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1909, No. 3,214, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Ernest Hamilton v. William Nelson Edwards and Godfrey D. Smith, trading as the Racquet Club Garage. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Carr, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $500. Defendants appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Oklady, J.,

The plaintiff was employed as a cement finisher by contractors of the defendants, who were so remodeling two old buildings as to use them as a garage. The *405main part of the work consisting in removing a partition .wall between the old buildings on the first floor and inserting beams and columns to support the superstructure. The entire ground floor was to be resurfaced with cement, and this work was well advanced before this accident happened to the plaintiff, who received his injuries while he was kneeling down trowelling the cement surface on the floor at a point…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Wilkinson v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Papilios v. Best Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API