Legal Opinion

Urban v. Village of Inverness

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1988No. 86-0083PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pincham

Plaintiffs, Martin Urban, Philip Urban and David Peterson, initiated this action to enjoin the Village of Inverness (the Village) and the Inverness Park District (the Park District), from (1) unnaturally increasing the flow of water over plaintiffs’ properties; (2) blocking the natural flow of water, which caused water to collect on plaintiffs’ properties; and (3) for damages to the structures on plaintiffs’ properties caused by flood. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs appeal and contend for reversal that the - affidavits and exhibits attached to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Rock Falls v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Ferentchak v. Village of FrankfortIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dakovitz v. Arrow Road Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Smith v. AshleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Bezin v. GinsburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacini v. RegopoulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Gass v. Metro-East Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. NeiserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Krilich v. Millikin Mortgage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Centro Medico Panamericano, Ltd v. Benefits Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API