Legal Opinion
Schostak v. First Liquidating Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1948No. Docket No. 6, Calendar No. 43,856PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Plaintiff, a Detroit real estate broker, brought this suit to recover commission on the basis of a nonexclusive listing given him by defendant for the sale of the 25-story National Bank Building in Detroit. The listing was in the form of a letter written by defendant to plaintiff, which reads:
“We wish to confirm our recent conversation with your representatives in which you were advised that we would pay a commission of 1% per cent, on the gross sale price of the property commonly known as the National Bank Building and located at the corner of Woodward Avenue and Cadillac Square, Detroit,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goodman v. Marcol, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Greenberg v. SakwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Friedenwald v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seelye v. BroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Rellinger v. BremmeyrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Seelye v. BroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- H. M. Seldon Co. v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Pastras v. OberlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.