Legal Opinion

Kamena v. Huelbig

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Argxred on final hearing, upon bill, answer, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The suit is to foreclose a mortgage dated September 24th, 1868, given by the defendants, Flentze and wife, to Elizabeth Huelbig, wife of Frederick Huelbig, to secure $1563. On the 1st of December, 1868, Elizabeth Huelbig, in the presence and with the consent of her husband, gave a note to Margaret Die-trick for $800, and pledged this bond and mortgage as security for its payment. The note containing the pledge was signed by Elizabeth Huelbig only. While the bond and mortgage were held on this pledge, Elizabeth Huelbig, with her husband, on the first day of May, 1869, by writing…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carnegie Bank v. ShalleckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Phila. v. WelchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  3. Moorestown Trust Co. v. BuzbyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. George F. Perry Son v. MandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Howell v. BartlettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API