Legal Opinion
Mejia v. Astrue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2010No. 09 Civ. 9656(AJP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge:
Pro se plaintiff Joseph Mejia brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying Mejia Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits. (Dkt. No. 2: Compl.) The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). (Dkt. No. 13: Am. Notice of Motion.) The parties have consented to decision of this case by a Magistrate Judge…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Benjamin J. Royer v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- De Cordova v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023