Legal Opinion

Scarcella v. Ascolese

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 10, 1944No. Docket 149/713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By deed dated October 5th, 1922, the defendant, Joseph Ascolese, and Carmelle Ascolese, his wife, conveyed to the complainant Susie Scarcella,

"ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land and premises, hereinafter particularly described, situate in the City of Hoboken, in the County of Hudson, and State of New Jersey, and which is known and distinguished upon a certain map entitled `Map of property situate at Hoboken, Hudson County, New Jersey, belonging to the estate of John G. Coster, deceased, surveyed and laid out into lots November, 1860, by Daniel Ewen and Austin D. Ewen, City…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Proprietors of Kennebeck Purchase v. CallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCarty v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Circle Associates v. McFadden, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API