Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bailey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Jackson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cukiam.

The suit is for a divorce, and the evidence is brief and direct. Under the circumstances we do not deem it necessary to state the evidence upon which our judgment is founded. It is sufficient to say that we think the court below was fully justified by the evidence in dismissing the plaintiffs complaint, and sustaining the defendant’s cross-bill, whereupon a decree of divorce was granted. But we think the evidence shows that the father is not only competent to take care of the child, but under the facts of this case, is the proper one to whom the care and custody of the child should…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API