Legal Opinion

Horseford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The evidence did not warrant the verdict, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Bartlett. Paulding superior court. November 15, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtFisi-i, C. J.

Dock Horseford was tried and found guilty of the offense of assault with intent to rape. He moved for a new trial, on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and was contrary to law, etc. A new trial was denied, and he excepted. The substance of the material evidence submitted in behalf of the State was as follows: The female alleged to have been assaulted was twelve years old. At the time of the alleged assault, three or four o’clock in the afternoon of a day in April, she was at her father’s house, which was situated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byfield v. CandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Vickery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Pickett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API