Horseford v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
The evidence did not warrant the verdict, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Bartlett. Paulding superior court. November 15, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtFisi-i, C. J.
Dock Horseford was tried and found guilty of the offense of assault with intent to rape. He moved for a new trial, on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and was contrary to law, etc. A new trial was denied, and he excepted. The substance of the material evidence submitted in behalf of the State was as follows: The female alleged to have been assaulted was twelve years old. At the time of the alleged assault, three or four o’clock in the afternoon of a day in April, she was at her father’s house, which was situated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byfield v. CandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Vickery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.