Legal Opinion

Clemmons v. Veasey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 22, 1983No. 82-374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

This appeal concerns the destructibility of an estate in three grantees created by a 1978 conveyance. The appellee contends that the appeal is untimely. We find the appeal timely and reverse and remand for further consideration.

FACTS

This action began with a “Complaint For Sale For Division And Incidental Relief” filed by Jarrell Earl Clemmons and his wife, Glenda Ellen Clemmons (appellants). The complaint alleged that the Clemmonses and defendant Veasey were joint owners of two lots in Phenix City under a deed dated *1254December 18, 1978. The deed was a conveyance by Veasey as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nunn v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Bernhard v. BernhardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Durant v. HamrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Yates v. GuestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SpainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Whittington v. Gilbralter Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API