Legal Opinion

People v. Brandyberry

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1990No. 88CA1741PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Defendants, Robert Brandyberry and Dennis Whelan, were charged by criminal indictment with conspiracy to kidnap and second degree kidnapping. Those charges arose from the forcible seizure and asportation of a 29-year-old member of the Unification Church (church). In a jury trial, defendants were jointly tried and acquitted.

The prosecution appeals, pursuant to § 16-12-102(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A), from a pretrial ruling that allowed defendants to present to the jury evidence in support of an asserted choice of evils defense. The People contend that the court erred in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. QuezadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. DeHerreraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. PetschowColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. SuazoColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. ShepherdColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. SpeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. BurkeColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API