Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 8419SC734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the first degree burglary charge should have been dismissed because the State’s evidence failed to show a breaking and entering of the dwelling involved. G.S. 14A-51. We disagree. A burglarious breaking and entering can be *590constructive, as well as actual. State v. Jolly, 297 N.C. 121, 254 S.E. 2d 1 (1979). A constructive breaking may be accomplished in a number of different ways. State v. Henry, 31 N.C. 463 (1849). One way is by tricking the occupant into opening the door, State v. Wilson, 289 N.C. 531, 223 S.E. 2d 311 (1976), another is by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  4. State v. . RodgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API