State v. Edwards
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the first degree burglary charge should have been dismissed because the State’s evidence failed to show a breaking and entering of the dwelling involved. G.S. 14A-51. We disagree. A burglarious breaking and entering can be *590constructive, as well as actual. State v. Jolly, 297 N.C. 121, 254 S.E. 2d 1 (1979). A constructive breaking may be accomplished in a number of different ways. State v. Henry, 31 N.C. 463 (1849). One way is by tricking the occupant into opening the door, State v. Wilson, 289 N.C. 531, 223 S.E. 2d 311 (1976), another is by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
- State v. . RodgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007