Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 14, 1914No. 1203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7462 (T. D. 33408) and Abstract 32433 (T. D. 33433).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The collector of customs at the port of New York classified a consignment of pumice stone as wholly or partly manufactured and *60assessed it for duty at tbree-eigbths of 1 cent per pound under that part of paragraph 89 of the tariff act of 1909 which reads as follows:

89. Pumice stone, -wholly or partially manufactured, three-eighths of one cent per pound; * * *. ■

The importers protested that the pumice stone was unmanufac-tured, valued at over $15 per ton, and therefore dutiable at one-fourth of 1 cent per pound under that part of paragraph 89 which reads as follows:

89. Pumice stone, * * *…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API