Association of Mexican-American Educators v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGould, Circuit Judge
I
I concur in Parts II, III, and IV of the majority’s opinion, and in the judgment. I write separately, however, to dissent from Part I and to express my view to the contrary that Title VII does not apply to the CBEST. The majority extends the reach of Title VII far beyond what Congress intended and in so doing creates potential mischief for all of our states.2
II
Section 703(a)(1) of Title VII provides, in relevant part:(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer-(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.