Woods v. Krizan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
Would the acquiring and operating of an apartment building, of 21 dwelling units, by a group of 21 individuals, for their own occupancy, under a tenancy in common, necessarily involve such an inherent cooperative undertaking and organization as would make the situation subject to the proviso of 62 Stat. 93, ch. 161, § 204(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1899(a) (2), of the Housing and Rent Act of 1948, “That in the case of housing accommodations in a structure or premises owned or leased by a cooperative corporation or association no action or proceeding [under paragraph 2 of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tudor Arms Apartments v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Woods v. PetchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Woods v. KrizanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aarons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- People v. HymanNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Woods, Housing Expediter v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949