Legal Opinion

Woods v. Krizan

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1949No. 13901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

Would the acquiring and operating of an apartment building, of 21 dwelling units, by a group of 21 individuals, for their own occupancy, under a tenancy in common, necessarily involve such an inherent cooperative undertaking and organization as would make the situation subject to the proviso of 62 Stat. 93, ch. 161, § 204(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1899(a) (2), of the Housing and Rent Act of 1948, “That in the case of housing accommodations in a structure or premises owned or leased by a cooperative corporation or association no action or proceeding [under paragraph 2 of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Tudor Arms Apartments v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Woods v. PetchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Woods v. KrizanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aarons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. People v. HymanNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Woods, Housing Expediter v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API