Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel E. Pressler, United States of America v. Scott Shreffler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 2, 2001No. 00-1824, 00-2588PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
A jury in the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania convicted Daniel Pressler and Scott Shreffler of conspiracy to distribute heroin. While Pres-sler appeals only his sentence, Shreffler challenges both his conviction and sentence. Shreffler’s appeal requires us to analyze the quality and quantity of evidence necessary to establish a conspiracy among individuals engaged in drug activity who are loosely associated.
Shreffler submits that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of conspiring to distribute heroin. To make out a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michael C. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. Robert U. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson, A/K/A Gexex JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. CarbajalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Kareem BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.