Legal Opinion

Piney Point Investment Corp. v. Photo Design, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 2, 1985No. 01-84-0629-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVANS, Chief Justice.

The principal question in this case is whether the appellees were entitled to a deficiency judgment in their suit on a promissory note. We hold that they were so entitled, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

In October, 1980, the appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Carlos Carpenter, decided to move to a farm in the country and sold their graphic design business, Photo Design, Inc., to Piney Point Investment Corporation. The total purchase price was $55,000, of which $15,950 was paid in cash. The balance was representéd by a promissory note in the amount of $39,050,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ley v. Main Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Henry H. BlantonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Riehn, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Cohen v. RainsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Henry G. Jordan and Charlene Hanson Jordan v. Coupland State Bank Ted W. Hejl, Substitute Trustee and Agent And C. W. Pfluger, Jr., as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Coupland State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  5. Joe M. Baragas and Randall McLerran v. Coupland State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API