Legal Opinion

United States v. Bosurgi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1975No. 71 Civ. 928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.

The United States of America (hereinafter “United States”), Chemical Bank New York Trust Company (hereinafter “Chemical Bank”), Benedict Ginsberg (hereinafter “Ginsberg” and the Sociedad Anónima de Inversiones Comerciales e Industriales (hereinafter “SAICI”) have each moved for summary judgment in this tax proceeding. 1 The United States, as plaintiff in this action, is attempting to obtain a judgment for the federal taxes allegedly due from the estate of Adriana Bosurgi, an Italian citizen and non-resident alien of the United States. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Will Flitcroft and Agnes D. Flitcroft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,849 Ernest Klein v. Walston & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Drummond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Cheng Yih-Chun v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BosurgiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  3. United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  4. Bosurgi v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. United States v. BosurgiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API