Poncar v. City of Mission
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
Jaime Poncar and her parents, Allen and Ruth Poncar, and Rigoberto Quintanilla and his parents, Pablo and Maria Quintanil-la, appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of the City of Mission, Texas, based on its governmental immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Appellants raise four points of error, contending that the trial court erred in granting the City’s motion because the summary judgment evidence was insufficient, that the City was not acting in a discretionary manner, that its activities were proprietary and not governmental, and lastly, that there are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of San Benito v. Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Fernandez v. City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Lawrence v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Zuniga v. Navarro & Associates, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Southern Disposal, Inc. v. City of Blossom, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.