State v. McCay, 88719 (8-9-2007)

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Eric McCay appeals from his convictions after a jury found him guilty of tampering with evidence and receiving stolen property.

{¶ 2} McCay argues in his three assignments of error that prosecutorial misconduct compromised his right to a fair trial, and that his conviction for receiving stolen property is not supported by either sufficient evidence or the manifest weight of the evidence.

{¶ 3} Following a review of the record, however, this court finds none of McCay's assignments of error have merit. Consequently, his convictions are affirmed.

{¶ 4} McCay's convictions…