Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1991No. CR-91-0126-PRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Chief Justice.

Sherman Earl Taylor (defendant) petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ memorandum decision affirming his conviction for second degree murder. We granted review to determine: (1) whether the trial court erred by refusing to give a justification instruction pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-411, and (2) whether the trial court erred by precluding evidence of the victim’s prior conviction for child abuse. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant, his girlfriend, and their children…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. StuardArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. IvesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API