Legal Opinion

East Rochester Construction Co. v. Eyer

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate order for examination of defendant before trial.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

In the complaint in an action for damages for false and fraudulent representations, it is alleged, with other things, that the defendants falsely represented to plaintiff “ that the defendants intended to construct concrete pavements and sidewalks upon said property as soon as the weather would permit in the spring of 1917. That concrete sidewalks, sewers, water mains and gas mains would be laid in the streets, avenues and boulevards upon said tract at the same *192time, and that when begun, the work of such construction would be pushed continuously to completion.” The answer of the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Herbage v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Schweinburg v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Kornbluth v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Terry v. Ross Heater & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HodgmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API